|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
1906
|
Posted - 2014.11.24 23:58:43 -
[1] - Quote
You have my votes!
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
CODE. is recruiting highsec PvPers for wardecs | New Order diplomat
"no one hates you, none of us care enough for that".
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
1943
|
Posted - 2014.12.04 11:10:13 -
[2] - Quote
Saeger1737 wrote:Walls of text that I didn't bother to read, for this I will not endorse you
~Words~ are scary things. Thanks for bumping the thread, though.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | Sabriz for CSM
New Order diplomat
"no one hates you, none of us care enough for that
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
1963
|
Posted - 2014.12.07 14:38:02 -
[3] - Quote
Django Askulf wrote:What a joke. This is about as funny as your campaign on ganking incursion runners. Probably end up about as successful.
Also, per your comment in Tora's thread.
"Out of game - he's absolutely, positively someone the CSM needs, and will probably receive second (maybe third) place on my recommended how to vote list."
You sure sound full of yourself, even have a recommended how to vote list, for the sheep?
Just another ******, trying for some Eve fame.
Thank-you for supporting Sabriz's campaign by bumping the thread.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | Sabriz for CSM
New Order diplomat
"no one hates you, none of us care enough for that
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
1969
|
Posted - 2014.12.09 09:10:07 -
[4] - Quote
And suddenly it all becomes clear - Lucas is Frying Doom, who viewers may recall attempted to **** up previous CSM threads only to see those candidates win. Never stop poasting, Frying Kell.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | Sabriz for CSM
New Order diplomat
"no one hates you, none of us care enough for that
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
1973
|
Posted - 2014.12.13 15:30:31 -
[5] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:admiral root wrote:And suddenly it all becomes clear - Lucas is Frying Doom, who viewers may recall attempted to **** up previous CSM threads only to see those candidates win. Never stop poasting, Frying Kell. Who are you again? Oh, nobody. Shush then kiddo. Grown ups are talking.
I spent the best part of a year in your alliance as a CEO and an alliance diplo, yet have no idea who you are. Two can play at that game. Thank-you again for your continued free bumps in support of the Sabriz for CSM campaign.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | No-one hates you, none of us care enough for that.
Sabriz for CSM
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
1985
|
Posted - 2014.12.14 01:53:02 -
[6] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:You seem to know who I am enough to have followed my posting history well enough to know where I was posting last year.
Persistant shiptoasters tend to stand out.
Quote:The fact that you're floating around this thread patting Sabriz on the back and shiptoasting at critics like some kind of lackey really shows how far you've fallen.
In breaking news, supporters of a CSM candidate were spotted posting supportive things in their candidate thread today.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | No-one hates you, none of us care enough for that.
Sabriz for CSM
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
1988
|
Posted - 2014.12.14 15:17:55 -
[7] - Quote
Reaver Glitterstim wrote: it's not a roleplaying game in any way.
Which part of MMORPG made you think that?
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | No-one hates you, none of us care enough for that.
Sabriz for CSM
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
1988
|
Posted - 2014.12.14 20:02:26 -
[8] - Quote
Zephris wrote:That pretty much sums up intention of Gankers. They are playground bullies
This is a tired and frequently mythbusted claim. Blowing up internet spaceships in a game about blowing up internet spaceships is not bullying.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | No-one hates you, none of us care enough for that.
Sabriz for CSM
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
1993
|
Posted - 2014.12.15 16:39:29 -
[9] - Quote
Sabriz, some time back, CCP Soundwave said he'd like to see Concord eventually replaced with player tools. What do you think of this idea? If you agree with it, do you think the time is right to lobby CCP over it? If you don't think it's time, why not?
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | No-one hates you, none of us care enough for that.
Sabriz for CSM
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
1996
|
Posted - 2014.12.16 17:20:40 -
[10] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Go do some real pvp against ships that can fight back.
If there are players on both sides it meets the definition of PvP and mining ships are certainly capable of packing tank, DPS and tackle.
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:CODE is weird role playing, but whatever turns you on I guess.
Role-play, sure - this *is* a role-playing game after all. Weird, not so much - we've claimed space as ours and we use force to keep it. We hold sov without those pesky sov mechics that everyone so loves (Yay! *Another* multi-million HP structure to grind - only 3 more to do in this system, chaps!). Our sov claim can be invalidated by other people taking it from us by force.
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:James aged 13 and a bit has an ego to rival that of mittens and you are associated with him in the game.
I'm sure you can do better than throwing around insults. Please try and be civil.
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Code offering to save hi-sec is like the fox offering to guard the chicken coop.
That's a terrible analogy, though interesting in that you seem to associate a segment of highsec players with a bunch of chickens.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | No-one hates you, none of us care enough for that.
Sabriz for CSM
|
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
2031
|
Posted - 2014.12.18 14:01:42 -
[11] - Quote
Zephris wrote: what actual risk is there to ganking ?
That you will lose your ship (it being a certainty doesn't stop it being a risk), that the loot fairy will stick two fingers up at you, that you get a great loot drop but someone else nicks it, that the gank will fail. Those are just off the top of my head. I'm sure there are a few more.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | No-one hates you, none of us care enough for that.
Sabriz for CSM
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
2048
|
Posted - 2014.12.19 03:57:39 -
[12] - Quote
Apol Regyri wrote:II will not vote for you. You represent everything i hate.
Under a pretext of roleplay, your gang of ganker (CODE) try to apply mafia techniques to take the property of others players in highsec (and often are young players with not a lot of isk). In addition, you (CODE) try to implanting to all the players in highsec the mafia "Pizzo".
I hope that CCP will adjust the Highsec security to make this place more safer for new player. Because CCP lose a lot of subscription to the game because your cowards technic discourage new players.
Remember, animal and humans learn through play. It's important to learn good human values and it's not what you do. You are about to rot this game with your so called "CODE Roleplaying" ganking. It's just a mafia technic! for looser.
Your "CODE" exceed the limit, and it is not fun for the player to be harassed every day.
Everything we do is within the rules and is as much part of the game as mission running or ATK mining. A safer high sec won't do anything for new players, BTW, it'll just mean more of them will have officer-fit pimpmobiles before they finally get blown up.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | No-one hates you, none of us care enough for that.
Sabriz for CSM
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
2246
|
Posted - 2015.01.31 00:04:06 -
[13] - Quote
Charles Muffins wrote:CODE is for people who feel insecure irl.
I honestly have no idea what you just said. Care to try again, this time in English?
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | No-one hates you, none of us care enough for that.
Sabriz for CSM
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
2364
|
Posted - 2015.02.17 16:30:17 -
[14] - Quote
Kaarous, it sounds like some of the trolls are blocking you. Does this make you despair?
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | No-one hates you, none of us care enough for that.
Sabriz for CSM
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
2394
|
Posted - 2015.02.18 19:49:33 -
[15] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:Your suggestions on war decs are stupid
I'm just sayin'.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | No-one hates you, none of us care enough for that.
Sabriz for CSM
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
2440
|
Posted - 2015.03.02 16:24:13 -
[16] - Quote
GetSirrus wrote:And you were instrumental in a dismal failure to organise creative content for players against incursions.
What content have you organised for players?
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | No-one hates you, none of us care enough for that.
Sabriz for CSM
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
2443
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:52:30 -
[17] - Quote
GetSirrus wrote:admiral root wrote:GetSirrus wrote:And you were instrumental in a dismal failure to organise creative content for players against incursions.
What content have you organised for players? I am not the one running for CSM with a platform of "content creation".
Running on a platform of content creation in no way requires him to run events. Also, RL happens. Of course, to an NPC with a blank killboard, none of this will make much sense as you're just here to troll. Thanks for keeping the thread bumped though.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | No-one hates you, none of us care enough for that.
Sabriz for CSM
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
2443
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 04:16:24 -
[18] - Quote
GetSirrus wrote:You should know that being bumped is not always the best position to be in.
Well played, NPC.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | No-one hates you, none of us care enough for that.
Sabriz for CSM
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
2527
|
Posted - 2015.03.19 23:45:32 -
[19] - Quote
Basil Pupkin wrote:Despite having 2 gewns and 1 codegewn, the community have managed to protect itself from the truly worst candidates.
Speaking on behalf of all the people who have read you candidacy nonsense I wish to express the following thought: get rekt, son.
Calm down, miner.
Sabriz - bad luck. Maybe next time?
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | No-one hates you, none of us care enough for that.
Sabriz for CSM
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
2529
|
Posted - 2015.03.20 13:38:18 -
[20] - Quote
Basil Pupkin wrote:It is no secret that the code of CODE openly states being the pets of gewns. You are in the CODE, you have the link to the code of CODE in your sig. What else? Being a gewn hisec pet is not about null sov, of course, it's doing what master orders. CODE is trying hard at that, and that includes you.
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Basil Pupkin wrote:Looking for balance is looking for status quo. Which IS the opposite of conflict.. To try put the above posts more simply:
- The game is weighted in the attackers favour and they still complain.
- They wonder why people get angry when they exploit weaknesses in the mechanics.
- Even ratters have more back bones because the rats actually shoot back.
Essentially, CCP can not code better brains for gankers and are breaking the game in the process.
http://cdn.meme.am/instances/500x/52739167.jpg
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | No-one hates you, none of us care enough for that.
Sabriz for CSM
|
|
|
|
|